Benchmarks & sources / Hands-on reviews

WIRED: six agents over one day

One reporter rates six finished assistants on five daily task categories over about 24 hours, using personal Gmail and Calendar.

WIRED / Reece Rogers · Published 2026-10-27 · reviewed 2026-10-29

Scope and method

One user, one day, six products × five categories; no independent repeats or uncertainty intervals.

Reporter-assigned 1–5 ratings. Preserve the task matrix; do not manufacture an aggregate or convert ratings into completion percentages.

How PAEval uses it

Editorial experience evidence. Claude Duet remains a source label; it has not been merged with the existing Claude/Cowork profile.

Evidence family: wired-2026-10-27. Shared tasks and tracks are not independent evidence votes.

Reporter task ratings /5

Source-labelled products; higher ratings reflect the reporter's assessment, not measured reliability.

ProductNewsLunchConflictTravel planEvening
Dots25544
Muse34254
Grok Bot14245
Claude Duet (source label)43432
Gemini Spark51132
Instinct12234

Limits and interpretation

  • Plans and product maturity differ; subjective ratings reflect one user's preferences.
  • Lunch carts and travel plans do not prove every product completed a purchase or reservation.

Sources and reuse

PAEval summarizes existing published evidence and runs no new tests. Public readability does not establish permission to redistribute full datasets, conversations or images.

Related product records

OpenAI dots · Meta Muse · Grok Bot · Gemini Spark · Instinct

All benchmark sources → · How to read outcomes and intervention →