Compare / Meta Muse vs Grok Bot
Meta Muse vs Grok Bot
Meta Muse is a persistent personal agent from Meta (United States); Grok Bot is an Individual/Team Agent from xAI (via Cursor) (United States). On Assistant Benchmark (1–10, updated 8 Oct 2026), Meta Muse scores 9.3 over 8 dimensions and Grok Bot scores 7.3 over 7; both were scored on 5 of the same dimensions, shown below. In micro1 PersonalAgentBench, Meta Muse completed 2 of 10 workflows with trusted completion and Grok Bot 3 of 10; the 95% intervals (6–51% and 11–60%) overlap, so the difference is not statistically separated. PAEval holds 30 capability records for Meta Muse and 33 for Grok Bot (as of 9 Oct 2026).
Scores stay on each evaluator's own scale and are never combined. PAEval does not pick a winner.
| Meta Muse | Grok Bot | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Meta | xAI (via Cursor) |
| HQ region | United States | United States |
| Type | Persistent personal agent | Individual/Team Agent |
| Pricing (as documented) | Free has a limit; Power is US$20/month, 500M Muse tokens/week; Maximum is US$100/month, 3B/week; automatic monthly renewal. | Cursor Pro/Pro+/Ultra are priced at US$20/60/200 per month respectively; Teams Standard/Premium are US$40/120 per user/month respectively,… |
| Assistant Benchmark1–10 mean of scored dimensions | 9.3coverage 8/15 | 7.3coverage 7/15 |
| micro1 PersonalAgentBench% of 10 workflows with trusted completion | 20%95% CI 6–51% | 30%95% CI 11–60% |
| SuperCLUE-XClaw0–100 weighted total of 5 dimensions | Not scored | Not scored |
| Autonomy & background work | Documented | Limited or conditional |
| Execution environments | Documented | Documented |
| Calls, messages & identity | Limited or conditional | Limited or conditional |
| Connectors & tools | Documented | Limited or conditional |
| Memory & personalization | Documented | Documented |
| Channels & interfaces | Documented | Documented |
| Research & deliverables | Documented | Documented |
| Transactions & bookings | Limited or conditional | Limited or conditional |
| Collaboration & parallelism | Documented | Limited or conditional |
| Reliability & recovery | Limited or conditional | Limited or conditional |
| Permissions, security & data | Limited or conditional | Limited or conditional |
| Capability records | 30 (0 independent) | 33 (0 independent) |
Capability cells show the strongest documented or observed status in each domain; availability is not task success.Add more products →
Assistant Benchmark, dimension by dimension
| Meta Muse | Grok Bot | |
|---|---|---|
| Carrying out an online task | 9test | 8observed in use |
| Travel booking | 7observed in use | Not tested |
| Recommendation quality | 9test | 7observed in use |
| Purchasing a product | 10observed in use | 8observed in use |
| Responding to emails | 10observed in use | 9observed in use |
| Proactive behavior | Not tested | Not tested |
| Running a routine | 10observed in use | Not tested |
| Third-party integrations | 10observed in use | 3observed in use |
| Permissions & privacy | 9observed in use | Not tested |
| Memory | Not tested | Not tested |
| Phone calls | Not tested | Not tested |
| Multiplayer / groups | Not tested | Not tested |
| Chained tasks | Not tested | 8observed in use |
| Proactive restraint | Not tested | Not tested |
| Content creation / games | Not tested | 8observed in use |
Source scores on the 1–10 anchor scale. "Not tested" is missing evidence, not zero.Source ↗